StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper presents The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable. Accountability appears like it is a matter of restricting choices that officials of an institution can make without running the risk of sanctions. (Lebeck, 2004). The concept of accountability describes the rights and responsibilities existing between people…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable"

The point of making people and organizations more accountable Accountability appears like it is a matter of restricting choices that officials of an institution can make without running the risk of sanctions. (Lebeck, 2004). The concept of accountability describes the rights and responsibilities existing between people and the institutions affecting their lives; this includes governments, civil society and market actors (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). The point of making people and organizations more accountable, is therefore, expected. The reasons are the concern of this paper, and they are slowly introduced as the discussion unfolds. Transparency as well as promises and performance are inherently related to accountability (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). This is because there are the stakeholders who need current information on the status of their concerns. For example, in an international session that looked at accountability across all sectors involved in HIV, including community, government and UN, a reporter reported that – The movement is now fragmented. There are some new voices but it’s not representative of everyone. And ever since treatment became accessible, the sense of urgency is lost. Many activists who were fighting for their lives have now gone on medication and gone back to having full time jobs (Narayanan, 2006). One strong point of making people and organizations more accountable is that people’s ability to realise their rights to resources have increased (Newell &Wheeler, 2006b). Accordingly more responsive institutions enable people to gain access to resources, equipping them with legal frameworks, citizen engagements, understanding of accountability, and state-market relations. Citizens are taught a range of informal and formal strategies to demand accountability, too. Another reason in making people and organizations more accountable is to fight the perception that the organization is illegitimate. Therefore, organizations, especially those international in scope, need to increase transparency, improve accountability, and think harder about norms for global governance (Nye, 2001). By increasing visibility, criticism may be minified (Lloyd & de Las Casas, 2005). It cannot also be discounted that some organizations are speaking up on behalf of marginalized communities and have facilitated the participation of these communities in such matters as HIV/AIDS response (Code of Good Practice, 2004). There are questions then about the quality and accountability of programmes being delivered by some organizations. NGOs are said to have lacked resources, technical skills or experience, and this has implications for the quality of programming, monitoring and evaluation of these programmes (Code of Good Practice, 2004). The truth is that not everyone benefits equally from programmes so that attention has to be given to issues of intra-community accountability, adequate channels of representation, and new mechanisms for inclusion and participation (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). This sense of community as a reason for accountability was also emphasized by Johnsson (1996). Another is that while markets have bonded people together, environmental, social, and political interdependence have also increased (Nye, 2001). There is concern that humanitarian agencies have no accepted body of professional standards to guide their work, especially when new ones are coming into the humanitarian sector. A truism is that whether experienced or newly-created, humanitarian assistance agencies could make mistakes, be misguided or sometimes misuse the trust placed in them (Borton, 1994). Moreover, any allocation of resources needs guidance (Code of Good Practice, 2004). There is also the need for donors to be more accountable to those they aim to support and those they press to reform (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). History is replete with peoples’ fight from developing countries with country borrowings with the World Bank and IMF. Indeed, rational behaviour (Olson et al, 1998) is one point of making people and organizations more accountable. Alarming as it may be, some governments are perceived conspiring with organizations against people’s interests so that there needs to be some accounting. The case of community based-organizations in Niger Delta exemplify this case – Youth groups and women’s organisations have formed in reaction to perceived collusion between government and the oil companies operating in the Niger Delta, leading to conflicts over oil. These groups represent communities in the Niger Delta who are not being heard through formal channels, and they often clash with powerful official institutions, such as local chiefs and elected officials. (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b) In all of these, however, the study of literature points to the fact that in the public sector the concept of accountability means different things. This is on account of variations in language practices, emerging from national political culture of each nation and rhetoric of the reforms (Olson, Guthrie & Humphrey, 1998). Further, at different times, there were different types of accountability perceptions. For example, in Britain and Australia, the commercial (market oriented) and the managerial (results oriented) models of accountability respectively dominated the definition (Guthrie and Parker, 1998), while in countries such as France, the emphasis was on bureaucratic control at a central level, and the management control on local levels (Hagland, 1998). In Japan and Germany, compliance with the central budget is the main factor behind the various definitions of accountability (Kokubo et al. 1998, Luder, 1998). In practice, accountability can take a number of different forms, depending on the institution in question. In general, however, relationships of accountability have two important components: answerability and enforceability (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). Answerability is said to be the right to get a response and the obligation to provide one; and, enforceability is the capacity to ensure that an action is taken, and that there is access to mechanisms for damages when accountability fails. The benefits of working accountability are that citizens are able to make demands on powerful institutions, and ensure that those demands are met (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). The concept of public accountability is said to be fundamental to the understanding of all other types of accountability. However, in some literature, the definition of public accountability has been cut back and considered synonymous with political accountability (Batley and Stoker, 1991). In fact, public accountability is also used to denote administrative accountability. It appears that assumptions of how public accountability is to be defined may vary in accordance with the country concerned. In research reports by Glynn (1977), and Walsh (1995), the managerial role of accountability is making a strong claim to represent public accountability. In contrast, in a report presented by Luder (1998), public accountability is politically defined in terms of the three levels of government, consisting of federal, state, and local. Luder has further contended that the key language of accountability is budget. Accordingly, by legal principles, the formal compliance between budget and expenditures is ensured, according to Luder. Accountability, however, is not just about financial accountancy (Newell & Wheeler, 2006a). Generally speaking, in the research reports of Olsen et al (1998), there is an indication that depending on the political and administrative characteristics of governments, national traditions, and political culture, the concepts of public accountability must carry the risk of being too narrow or too broad. A different tack is taken by the Swedes who focus on the ideals that characterize public accountability. These are democratic involvement, local democratic movements, and politically-determined bureaucratic structure. Generally, public accountability is often understood as a kind of vocal expression that interrelate the communities with the local politicians. According to Olson, et al. (1998), public accountability is to be understood by three orientations: the bureaucratic or legal, the administrative, and the political. In Johnsson’s (1988) view, the bureaucratic or legal accountability is structured by interpretation of Municipal law and principles of local budgeting. Administrative accountability is established through the adoption of professionally-defined organizations, and skill in service professions, whereas, political accountability is maintained by the administration of trust, and consideration of information drawn from the context of each particular local government (Johnsson, 1996). This is the same definition given earlier by Newell & Wheeler (2006a) with particular emphasis on location or country. From the perspective of development, as accountability shapes people’s ability to realise their rights to resources, services and institutions, they need responsive institutions to help them. Such institutions have an obligation to provide an account of their actions (or inaction), and also the means to address failures (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). Relative to this, an evaluation made of some governments like India, Nigeria, and Bangladesh said - ... As Citizenship DRC research in Kenya and South Africa shows, legal frameworks are insufficient if governments do not have the capacity to fulfil their commitments. In some cases such as India, governments are complicit in violating people’s rights and ignoring their own progressive legal frameworks. … People sometimes seek more radical ways to secure their rights when there are few channels of representation and little access to justice. This can result in violence, such as the conflicts over oil in Nigeria. ... Garment workers in Bangladesh wanted accountability from their employers not only to make corporations fulfil their obligations, but as a means to improve their working conditions and livelihoods. (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b) The report found issue with India in ignoring its legal frameworks, Nigeria in providing little access to justice, and Bangladesh in the poor working condition of its garment workers. In all of these, accountability to the people is being called for. Corrections into some myths about accountability reported by the Institute of Development Studies (In Newell & Wheeler, 2006a) may provide more understanding on accountability. For example, lack of accountability is often the result of longstanding patterns of exclusion and corruption; therefore it is not something new. It is also not a problem for developing countries because accountability deficits exist worldwide. More so, accountability is not just about creating checks and balances on state power because it is about much more than this. As it is, globalisation is increasingly requiring that the accountability of intergovernmental bodies, private companies and civil society organisations be addressed (Newell & Wheeler, 2006b). Further, accountability is not just something that is provided by states to citizens as citizens can create it from where they are. Approaches that work in one country can not be applied directly to other locations because distinct institutional, economic, social and cultural factors will determine which initiatives are successful and ‘owned’ by local groups and which are less effective (Newell & Wheeler, 2006). This was emphasized earlier by the differences noted in studies by Glynn (1977), Walsh (1995), Luder (1998), and Johnsson (1996). In sum, the point of making people and organizations more accountable is strongly because resources are owned not just by one person but by collective wholes. Reference ‘Code of Good Practice for NGOs Responding to HIV/AIDS, sign-on, implementation & accountability, options & recommendations.’ June 16, 2004. Retrieved February 16, 2007, http://www.ifrc.org/what/health/hivaids/code/files/options_paper_sign_on_implementation.pdf Batley, R. & Stoker, G. 1991, Local government in Europe: Trends and developments. London: Macmillan Education LTD. Borton, J. Network Paper 7. Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in Disaster Relief RPN, Overseas Development Institute, September 1994. Glynn, J. 1987, Public Sector financial control and accounting. University of Kent at Canterbury, second edition, Blackwell-Synergy. Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. 1998, ‘Manageralism and Marketisation in financial management change in Australia’ (Eds. In Olson et al 1998, Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public financial Management Cappelen Akademisk forlag Oslo). Hagland, N. 1998, ‘Centralism, secrecy and Unaccountability: A Long road to reform in France.’ (Eds. In Olson et al 1998, Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public financial Management Cappelen Akademisk forlag Oslo). Johnsson, S. 1996, ‘Decoupling hierarchy and accountability: an examination of trust and reputation’ (Eds. In Munro, R. & Mouritsen, J. 1996, Accountability, Power, Ethos, and Technologies of Managing, pp. 103-117. London: International Thomson Business Press). Kokubo, K., Shiba, K.Kaot, Y., & Okano, H. ‘A runner a Lap behind in the race for public sector financial management reform the Japanese case.’ (Eds. In Olson et al 1998, Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public financial Management Cappelen Akademisk forlag Oslo). Lebeck, C. ‘Deliberation, Delegation and Accountability’. Paper conference on Institutional Economics and Law. Walter-Eucken Institute, Freiburg-im-Breisgau. October 8-10, 2004. Retrieved February 17, 2007, from http://www.eucken.de/veranstaltungen/workshop2004/Lebeck.pdf Lloyd, R. and de Las Casas, L. ‘Alliance Extra. NGO self-regulation: enforcing and balancing accountability.’ December 2005. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from http://www.allavida.org/alliance/axdec05e.htm Luder, K. ‘Towards a new financial management for Germanys’ public sector: Local government lead the way.’ (Eds. In Olson et al 1998, Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public financial Management Cappelen Akademisk forlag Oslo). Narayanan, P. Accountability: Promises, Performance and Possibilities. KC 4: ‘Building new leadership to advance the response report.’ Symposium. Rapporteur reports. 2006. Newell, P. & Wheeler, J. Making Accountability Count. IDS Policy Briefings. ISSUE 33. November 2006. Institute of Development Studies, 2006, ISSN 1360-4724. Newell, P. & Wheeler, J. (eds). 2006, Rights, resources, and the politics of accountability. London: Zed Books. Nye, J. S. Jr. ‘Globalization's Democratic Deficit: How to Make International Institutions More Accountable.’ Foreign Affairs, July/August 2001, Council on foreign Relations. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20010701facomment4989/joseph-s-nye-jr/globalization-s-democratic-deficit-how-to-make-international-institutions-more-accountable.html Olson, O., Guthrie, J., & Humphrey, C., ‘New world? Small world? Better world?’ (Eds. In Olson et al., 1998. Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public financial Management Cappelen Akademisk forlag Oslo). Pashang, H. 2003, March, Processes of accountability. ISBN 91-7246-205-1. Goteborg. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from http://www.aids2006.org/PAG/PSession.aspx?s=114 Roberts, J. 1991, ‘The Possibility of Accounting.’ Accounting, Organization and Society (AOS). Pp. 355-368. Van Dyke, M. & Waldman, R. The Sphere Project Evaluation Report, January, 2004. Walsh, K 1995, Public Services and Market mechanism: competition, contracting, and the New Public management. Macmillan Press, LTD. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable Essay, n.d.)
The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1532918-the-point-of-making-people-and-organizations-more-accountable
(The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable Essay)
The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable Essay. https://studentshare.org/business/1532918-the-point-of-making-people-and-organizations-more-accountable.
“The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1532918-the-point-of-making-people-and-organizations-more-accountable.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Point of Making People and Organizations More Accountable

Strategic Planning for South County Hospital in Making It an Accountable Care Organization

This would make it an accountable Care Organization benefiting from the merger with other hospital.... Increasing number of people in south Rhode have been requiring this service owing to the increase in occurrence of life style diseases and more people being informed of the need for regular and frequent medical check ups.... Name: Institution: Professor: Date: South County Hospital Strategic Plan towards Converting To an Aco PERIOD: JAN 2013- DEC 2016 Executive summary Health care is a fundamental human right for all people....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Managers as Powerful and Privileged Individuals - MG Rover

At that point of time, BMW sold, rather abandoned Rover at throwaway prices.... They bought the company for 10, and emerged as saviors for Rover at that point of time.... hellip; These managers have immense powers to turn systems, but with all this power do they have the responsibility too Real time cases show that varied organizations have given plenty of power to their managers, many privileges, but have not held them accountable for their actions....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The Key Issues Surrounding Financial and Marketing Applications of Management Information System

MIS systems enable organizations to transform unmanageable volumes of data into formats that support faster decision making.... Faster decision making empowers organizations with the capability to survive in today's rapidly changing business environment.... MIS systems also enable organizations to run simulations based on raw data which allows them to answer 'what if' questions regarding their strategy.... Also, it assists in encouraging organizations to collaborate with their customers on product designs and preferences....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper

Human Resource Management at Coca-Cola Company

great part of this development is the department of Human Resources of these corporations, who are accountable for employing people with the information to bring novel technology into a corporation (Conaty and Ram 2011).... For an organization, like General Motors has spent more than 50 billion dollars in the previous decade to update its production amenities to develop abilities in supple manufacturing (Shetty, 2011).... When novel technical developments provide some organizations a viable benefit, their competitors attempt to catch up by taking on and improving on the novel skills....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Accountability of the United Nations

In this part, how the UN has failed to remain accountable for its activities and role in the conflict zones, such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Ukraine war, have severely damaged the perception of the UN as an international institution providing and protecting the human rights globally.... more specifically, some countries legalise marijuana whereas the international law strong discourage and disallow such items as they are harmful for health....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Organization Structure and Mission of the DADHC

The organizational focus of valuing people and customer points to a group/ clan type of structure within departments.... Rodger and Mickan (2000) emphasize the need for health care organizations to provide a clear purpose that is consistent with the mission to enable better integration and alignment between disparate teams.... John and Keleher (2006) point out that the hierarchical structure allows a formal method of effective functioning at an intra- and inter-unit level (p....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Organizational Design for Procurement and Supply Objectives

From this point of view, all consumers contribute in the course of action of procurement.... In its most fundamental type, procurement is nothing more than the actions that are utilized in the acquirement of goods and services.... rganization Design is an officially approved procedure for incorporating the information, people, resources, and technology of business....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Building High-Performance People and Organizations

The author of this case study entitled "Building High-Performance people and organizations" focuses on the success of businesses in the global market which is highly depended on their ability to develop effective performance management strategies.... In this context, the efforts of organizations to keep the motivation of their employees at high levels can be fully understood (Griffin and Moorhead 2011).... 17), which suggests that 'people want to be treated fairly' (Griffin and Moorhead 2011, p....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us