StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Property Law - Western Australia - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper 'Property Law - Western Australia" is a good example of a law case study. The key objective of the Torrens system is to enhance the process of proving the title to estate inland. The program proves title and facilitates the registration to protect the interests and the estates from the biased operation…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.2% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Property Law - Western Australia"

PROPERTY LAW-WESTERN AUSTRALIA. Name: Student NO: Lecturer: Course: Assignment: Date of Submission: PROPERTY LAW- WESTERN AUSTRALIA Introduction. Ownership of land can be illustrated to be a bundle of rights which includes the right to construct buildings, harvest timber or crops, subdivide the land or to limit the access. Anyone who owns a land (landowner) may donate or sell the complete bundle of rights or just a portion of these rights. By either donating or selling easement, the owner of the land exchanges the rights for either tax or cash for the reason of protecting the parcel land. Normally the state always has interest to acquire fee when acquiring land. In some situations for example a case where by the acquisition fee is deemed impractical, impossible or undesirable and therefore obtaining limited interest in land is ideal. A conservation easement are typically based on a voluntary contracts between a willing seller and a willing buyer, the contract underlines what developments, applications and uses that will be permitted under the easement and the contact holds all the present and the future users or parties. The easements are flexible and can be personalized or tailored to accommodate the demands for both the party that will hold the easement and the present land owner. The common barriers and restrictions comprise the limitation to construct a building, subdividing the land, developing the property for commercial purposes or even limitations on timber production. Broadly speaking, easements are ‘non-possessory interest in land of another’. Its also a desire for land that still in the possession of another. The traditional easement would allow the right to use the land for a particular reason, while the conservation easements impose restrictions on the applications on the land and that the latter of the conservation easement merely cannot apply the rights passed over to him but to authenticate that the rights are in his custody to the entire period of the easement. The body with the statutory mandate is the DNR (A.S.38.05.035 (a)(11) to obtain land property on behalf of the state. Under this umbrella DNR has the obligation to minimize the States exposure to the future unprecedented risks. ( The Uniform Conservation Easement Act, Chapter A.S. 34.17). Property. Property refers to something that belongs to another and has a legal relationship with the owner and is treated as a bundle of rights.(Wily v St George Partnership Banking Ltd (1999) 84 FCR 423 at 426 per Sackville J)- Statutory Regulations of Interest in Land Deeds and Torrens Registration. The key objective of the Torrens system is to enhance the process of proving of the title to estate in land. The program proves title and facilitates the registration to protect the interests and the estates from biased operation. And ensures that there is proper documentation and its accessible at various government regional offices so that both the parties who have interest in the easement can obtain the legal documentation on the same. Australia is one of the countries of common law, hence the people as far as the property they own is concerned have very distinct and outstanding rights on decision regarding their rightfully owned property including land and at law. In fact through the ruling of the high court which was delivered by Mr. Justice Kirby in September of 1998.people who own property and whose land is held under the authority of Deeds in Fee Simple have all the right to refuse to consent a takeover of their land for any development or any other given purpose regardless of its benefits. Putting this piece of legislation in perspective and n accordance with Harrie’s problem, we can see that through the law and the subsequent high court ruling he can sufficiently lodge a legal claim to have his piece of land and can lawfully recover his land from each of Lucinda, William, the environmentalists, and SRT. See (Wilson, “Indefeasibility of Title under Torrens: Leros Pty Ltd v Terara Pty Ltd” (1992) 22 UWALR) Private Property Owners and Rights: People, organizations and entities who own property in Australia are guaranteed rights by three different instruments legally in three different ways, as under: 1. Fee –Simple Deeds. 2. 1215 Magna Carta. 3. 1688/9 The Bill of Rights. Rights under Fee Simple, particularly paying attention to Mr. Justice Kirby’s ruling in the High Court ruling, in September of1998, when he made a decision by referring to an earlier casein the High Court (1923) when a dispute was settled by Mr. Justice Isaacs by confirming and emphasizing to the person whose owns property in the case where the rights conferred and referred on all property-owners under their Fee Simple Freehold Deeds. As to the current laws which are applicable in Australia, both Federal and State, it is absolutely very illegal and unwarranted for the Government or any other outside entity ,be it fundamentalists, action groups or private bodies “to take or do what it wants", or indeed to force or dictate in any way what the property-owners must do and exercise or not warranted to do in regard to their property and in this case lands held under Deeds in Fee Simple so long our Common Law status is always retained and I don’t see that going away any soon under our legally unchangeable and can’t be rewritten Holly Monarchical Constitutions, which apply both federally and state wise. Since no entity or action group can legally claim to take over Harry’s property or dictate to harry what to do with it, the environmentalists have no legal claim whatsoever to venture into harries land under any circumstances so long as he has any clause that can give him a lease of life under Deeds Fee simple. Harry therefore can pursue the avenue of using the past High Court ruling by Mr. Justice Kirby to try get back his property. Though certain politicians are trying to illegally change our very unchangeable Federal constitution through other ways other than referendum, because of their want and greed to deny people the right to hold and enjoy private property under our tidy Monarchical laws. Present protection of property rights through "Fee Simple"   In the Australian high court, in a decision in the case New South Wales vs. The Commonwealth, Justice Isaacs talked of "fee simple" as stated below:  "In the English law language, the word fee largely signifies an estate of the inheritance as distinguishable from a less estate fee simple is one the most and very extensive in quantum, and the almost absolute as far as respect to the rights, which it confers, of all the entire estates known clearly to the law. It confers, and as long as since the beginning of the current legal history it has always conferred, the eventful lawful right to exercise on and over, upon, in the respect to, the property land, entire act of ownership which can brought into the current imagination, including the less glamorous right to commit some waste; for all practical and real existing purposes of ownership, it meaningfully differs from the absolute structure of dominion of a chattel, not in any way except the physical indestructibility and defeat of its entire subject. Besides ownership rights, a fee simple as applicable as at of today confers and gives some absolute right, both of and of devise by will and the alienation inter vivos ." Mostly non-leased properties mainly in Shannon Western Australia are "Fee Simple", and this therefore means that the majority of property-owners have multiple rights that override any private sector, action groups like environmentalists or Government Department. Unfortunately many landowners like Mr. Harry are not aware of their rights. There are also some other court rulings given [such as Dillon v. Plenty made in 1991] and legislative chapter further confirms the fact that property-owners in this part of country have the ultimate law entirely on their side and Mr. Harry should take this as an avenue of throwing in a court case against his tormentors so that he can lawfully recover his land from each of Lucinda, William, the environmentalists, and SRT. (DILLON v.PLENTY (1991) 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004 – THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA) a) The person occupying any house dwelling gives extends a license to all members or any member of public coming to his rightful business to get access through the gate, use the steps until the entrance of the premise and knock the door. The license also holds the driveway. Nevertheless, withdrawal of the license may be permitted when a notice of withdrawal is given to that effect. This means that if anyone chooses to remain or enter the property when the withdrawal is in effect will be regarded as a trespasser. In (Lisle v. Davis (1936) 2 KB 635) the law enforcing officers who had lawfully gained access to a garage for reasons of lodging an inquiry became trespassers simply by extending their stay in the garage when the business owner had requested them to leave the premise.  b)      The law is very clear and is against officials of state agency or government officials possessing the rights of access or entry on privately owned property without the authority of the occupier and by extension it does not matter whether the officer has some warrant of summon or not, the point is this is no exception and permission has to be given by the occupier. The occupier must have a clear consent. In view of this, it therefore by law for the current occupiers of the property that Harry is claiming to still administer the ownership of the land and may deny Harry entry into the property or otherwise face legal consequences of trespassing. Alternatively is Harry still interested in obtaining a legal redress on the matter, he may go to the supreme court to challenge the order of the rights currently being enjoyed the occupier of the property. Harrys’ case should be an example many Australians and to know that when entering an easement with one you should done legitimately and where possible, deeds are issued to support their cases and to avoid future eventualities. Had Potter obtained the bundle of rights of the property of pass it over the claimant, the case would have much simplified due to proper and adequate evidence to stand for him. In many cases persons in the name of friends have brought a lot of troubles to the fellows who had trusted them with their possessions. This case is complex and the parties should agree to get solution which is not from court because its expensive and justice may not prevail. . Refernces: 1.Bradbrook C Ch 5Butt, Land Law, 6th ed, Ch 19, 20Chambers R, An Introduction to Property Law in Australia, Ch 30, 31, 32 2. G.Moore, Essential Real Property, 3. Price, R & L, Griggs, Property Law in Principle 4. Tan, P, Butterworth’s Tutorial Series Land Law/ 5. Course work material Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Property Law - Western Australia Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words, n.d.)
Property Law - Western Australia Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. https://studentshare.org/law/2078031-propert-law-western-australia
(Property Law - Western Australia Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Property Law - Western Australia Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/2078031-propert-law-western-australia.
“Property Law - Western Australia Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”. https://studentshare.org/law/2078031-propert-law-western-australia.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Property Law - Western Australia

SWOT Analysis

Australia consists of six states; New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, western australia and Tasmania and 2 territories; the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory.... Name of author: australia (australia Map) Dutch explorers discovered the Australian continent in 1606.... australia, the smallest continent in the world, is located at southeast of Asia, between the Pacific and Indian oceans....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Comparative of two countries police agencies

Based in foreign countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan but actively operating in australia and alleged to be supporting terrorist training to the Australians and receiving heavy funding from australia. ... tmlk- Identify any terrorist groups or organizations active in the country selectedLashkar-e-Taiba, al-Qaeda and Jemaah IslamiahBased in foreign countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan but actively operating in australia and alleged to be supporting terrorist training to the Australians and receiving heavy funding from australia....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Functions of the Western Australian Law

The author of the paper "Functions of the western Australian Law" argues in a well-organized manner that the law that governs property is based on the ownership of such properties.... The law has various functions.... he police officers should have obeyed the law by adhering to the required speed used by the drivers along the specified route.... riminal law ... he law discourages activities that would likely cause accidents....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

International Business: Economical Overview of Australia

Queensland, New South Wales, Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, western australia, and Northern Territory are the states and territories of Australia.... An author of this paper will conduct an analysis of the political, economic and legal climate in australia, discussing socioeconomic and cultural factors.... australia is a culturally diverse country with a robust economy and a population of approximately 21 million....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

The Changes That Court Decision Brought to the Australian Land Laws

The landmark decision of the court in the case of Eddie Mabo and Ors v The State of Queensland is one of the most celebrated cases is the history of australia.... n deciding this case, the High Court of australia said that the Meriam people have rights over the lands they occupied.... the overturning of the doctrine of terra nullius (land belonging to no one) in Australian land law, the question as to when a native title is deemed extinguish and the effect of this decision on existing as well as future land rights legislation....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Discrimination in the Australian Law of Marriage

An author of the review "Discrimination in the Australian Law of Marriage" seeks to critically discuss the legal vulnerabilities of marriage law in australia.... The utmost importance is attached to the family in the family law of australia.... This could prove to be onerous, as a promise to marry, in the tribal Aboriginal sense, is anathema to what the western culture believes, regarding consent to the marriage (Parkinson, 1994: 480).... The Australian legal system is based on English law....
8 Pages (2000 words) Literature review

Discovering Opportunities in Property Project

The process is fully defined by the law and is practiced within formal settings.... The author of the paper under the title "Discovering Opportunities in property Project" focuses on luxury apartments.... The price of this property is $700,000.... he property is at Bartels road, which is 700 meters from Wakefield street, was bought at $610,000.... The specification of the property was similar to that of this property, although the Bartels property had 1 parking space....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Business Law - Joseph and Clara v Marshall and Edward

The australia contract law offers some remedies when a contract breach happens.... The second qualification is good faith, which is widely acknowledged and used by courts in australia in both contractual performances of terms and pre-contractual.... The paper "Business law - Joseph and Clara v Marshall and Edward " is a great example of a law case study.... Using relevant case law, this essay offers advice to Joseph and Clara regarding their legal rights and/or obligations and examines the probability of either Edward or Marshall succeeding in taking legal action against Joseph....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us