StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Common Biases in Self-Perception - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the following paper "Common Biases in Self-Perception" argues in a well-organized manner that the perceptions people carry about themselves as well as those that they share with others reflect their individual personality traits…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.1% of users find it useful
Common Biases in Self-Perception
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Common Biases in Self-Perception"

? Common biases in self-perception School Common biases in self-perception Assessment of the common patterns of biases in self-perceptionand identification of ways to eradicate them is a subject of prime importance particularly in the research of social psychology where conclusions are drawn based on the data retrieved from people through interviews. The quality of information depends upon the extent to which the interviewee was unbiased in the responses to the questions asked. The perceptions people carry about themselves as well as those that they share with others reflect their individualistic personality traits (Furnham and Henderson, 1983, p. 387). People reactions in situations originate in the very perceptions. In order to change people’s reactions and responses to the challenges of everyday life, it is imperative that biases in self-perception, factors governing the self-perceptions, people’s tendency and willingness to change their self-perceptions for the better, and possible ways to achieve this are explored. A very common misconception about the perceptions is that they are passive and are created as a result of an individual’s recorded information about the subject from the past experience. In reality, perceptions are active and create reality rather than recording it depending upon an individual’s response to the stimuli (Curry, Meyer, and McKinney, 2006, p. 28). Self-perceptions play a big role in the quality of performance of an individual. Yammarino and Atwater (1993) proposed a model according to which accurate self-perception leads to better individual and organizational outcomes whereas inflated or deflated self-perception leads to diminished or mixed results respectively. The behavior and psychology of an individual is different when he/she is working as part of a group from when he/she is working alone. Generally, people tend to have self-serving biases when they are being part of a team. They tend to take credit for the team’s successes while indulge in a blame-game to avoid the responsibility of failure (Taylor and Doria, 1981, p. 210). Factors that help an individual carry accurate self-perceptions include but are not limited to high self-esteem, knowledge, and good critical analysis skills. Reifenberg (2001, p. 627) found that people who make good judgments about their performance have higher internal attributions than others whose judgments are not quite as good. Lack of the skill to respond accurately to particular situations at hand arises from lack of people’s awareness of their lack of ability to differentiate between the accurate and inaccurate response to the very situations. This essentially means that rather than being ignorant of their lack of skill to respond accurately, such people are ignorant about their ignorance. Instead of realizing their deficiencies, these people tend to overestimate their skill of responding in the right way thinking there is no problem all which is how their ignorance works. People with low talent are more optimistic about their performance as compared to the people with high talent. Indeed, the latter are slightly pessimistic about their performance not because they underestimate their own skills, but because they tend to overestimate the skills of others, whereas actually others are not as good at responding in the right way as they are. On the other hand, the optimism of the people with low talent originates in their lack of knowledge, thus causing them more trouble with their metacognitive judgments. Failure of these people to realize their incompetence is because of the fact that they are doubly cursed in that they are not only unable to make the right response but are also unable to differentiate between the right and wrong response. “[I]ncompetence means that people cannot successfully complete the task of metacognition, which, among its many meanings, refers to the ability to evaluate responses as correct or incorrect” (Dunning et al., 2003, p. 85). Others’ opinions about one’s skills and capabilities are more accurate as compared to one’s own idea of one’s skills and capabilities. In a vast majority of cases, people’s self-perceptions are guided by a positive bias. The modest bias of self-enhancement is generally considered to be a healthy adjustment, though it may not always be the case. Considerable research done in the past has demonstrated that people who are actually poorer performers inflate their self-ratings in comparison to others who show greater achievements. Little is known about the factors that control one’s self-perceptions regarding one’s skills and talents. If the sense of distinction between the right and wrong responses to a certain challenge at hand is inculcated in the people, they might in turn develop the skill of producing the right responses. There is a whole range of factors that affect the cognitive processes involved in self-other rating. “[P]ersons who are defined as "sensing types" on the MyersBriggs Type Indicator (MBTI) tend to be databased in their judgments of self and others, whereas "intuitives" rely much less on data” (Yammarino and Atwater, 1997, p. 39). However, since it is not easy to determine the factors that lead an individual to agree or disagree in the self-other rating data, it cannot be said with utmost surety that the sense of identifying the right choice can be inculcated in a certain individual. Yammarino and Atwater (1997) describe several strategies of improving the self-other ratings of individuals, which can be summarized into the cautious use of upward and 360-degree feedback. Concluding, biases in self-perception lead to poor judgments and performances. There are basically two types of inaccurate self-raters; over-estimators and under-estimators, with the former being poor performers and the latter being good performers. Sometimes, judgments that others make about one’s abilities are more accurate as compared to one’s own judgment because of one’s biases of self-perception. A multitude of factors influence people’s judgments including their personality traits, past experiences, and extent of knowledge. In a vast majority of cases, people cannot handle situations correctly because they do not know that the fault lies in their self-perceptions rather than any external factor. Realization of biases in self-perceptions is the first step towards the elimination of their social interaction problems. Provision of the people with training and development to inculcate the sense of accurate judgment in them is of immense importance because knowledge of distinction between right and wrong is the pre-requisite of behaving or performing right. References: Curry, D. G., Meyer, J. E., and McKinney, J. M. (2006, June). Seeing vs perceiving: What you see isn’t always what you get. Professional Safety. pp. 28-34. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., and Kruger, J. (2003). Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence. American Psychological Society. 12(3): 83-87. Furnham, A., and Henderson, M. (1983). The mote in thy brother’s eye, and the beam in thy own: Predicting one’s own and others’ personality test scores. British Journal of Psychology. 74: 381-389. Reifenberg, R. J. (2001). The self-serving bias and the use of objective and subjective methods for measuring success and failure. The Journal of Social Psychology. 126(5): 627-631. Taylor, D. M., and Doria, J. R. (1981). Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology. 113: 201-211. Yammarino, F. J., and Atwater, L. E. (1993). Understanding self-perception accuracy: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management. 32(2 and 3): 231-247. Yammarino, F. J., and Atwater, L. E. (1997). Do Managers See Themselves As Others See Them? Organizational Dynamics. pp. 35-44. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Common Biases in Self-perception Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Common Biases in Self-perception Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1455796-identify-and-explain-the-common-biases-in-self
(Common Biases in Self-Perception Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Common Biases in Self-Perception Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/management/1455796-identify-and-explain-the-common-biases-in-self.
“Common Biases in Self-Perception Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1455796-identify-and-explain-the-common-biases-in-self.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Common Biases in Self-Perception

Psychological Theories

Individuals in a group have regular contacts and time to time interaction, mutual coexistent, and they work together for a common goal.... Individuals in a group have regular contacts and time to time interaction, mutual coexistent, and they work together for a common goal.... In the situation of ill judgment on the bases of stereotype, conflict and mistrust in common....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

'Memory is simply biased, inaccurate history.' Discuss

Memory is simply biased, inaccurate history Introduction The emergence of the key word of memory has marked a revolutionary change in the practice of linguistics.... “We might be tempted to imagine the increasing use of memory as the natural result of an increased scholarly interest in the ways that popular and folk cultures construct history and the past” (Klein, 2000, p....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Judgment of Leaders

This is common where the followers exhibit dominant motif and in this case the followers look compliant and can be easily manipulated even at the extreme ends (Oddenino, 2003).... This is common in organizations and... The Judgment of leaders The contextual framework of judging leaders at the present has increasingly become complex attributed to the ascribed perspective of the follower to the underlying leadership....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Employee Perceptions of Equity in Performance Appraisals

nbsp;Because of these factors, this study will identify the different types of appraisal bias, where these biases stem from, and how long-term, working relationships between manager and subordinate can be strengthened through possible bias control methods.... The purpose of this proposed study is to determine whether employee/manager relationships can be strengthened through unbiased performance appraisals....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

How do perception cognition and emotion affect negotiation

Negotiator should be aware that cognitive biases and misperceptions that occurs as he gather and process information and outline them in a structured manner within his team and with his counterparts.... In addition, careful discussion of the issues during negotiation and preference can minimize the outcomes of perceptual biases.... Closely related to these aspects are the various types of cognitive biases that may result in an outcome of in negotiations: Irrational escalation of commitment, overconfidence, anchoring and adjustment, availability of information, issue framing and risk the winner's curs, the law of small numbers, endowment effect, self-serving biases, reactive devaluation, ignoring others' cognitions....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Common Errors of Law Enforcement

While conducting a criminal investigation, the law enforcement officers such as the investigators, patrol officers, preliminary tion team, follow-up investigation team, all can make several common mistakes or psychological pitfalls can be there that can result in erroneous criminal investigation.... These common error and psychological pitfalls must be known beforehand in order to avoid them while conducting an investigation.... The first and foremost common error that an investigating officer can make is asking an eyewitness leading questions that can make him or her inform what he/she has not witnessed....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

The Social and Cultural Diversity

This report "The Social and Cultural Diversity" discusses the personal history and personal biases of the writer, concepts of racism/discrimination, and a review of ACA and NAADAC codes of ethics in addressing cultural bias.... Individual helpers need to start by defining their cultural awareness and attitudes, reflecting on personal biases and prejudice, and a clear understanding of racial discrimination....
8 Pages (2000 words) Report

The Impact of Media Elites and Liberal Bias on the Role of a Watchdog

"The Impact of Media Elites and Liberal Bias on the Role of a Watchdog" paper argues that truth is no longer the heart of journalism.... The field has been commercialized and the rush is on quenching personal interests rather than acting as the public watchdog.... nbsp; … Walter Lippmann famously wrote that journalism was an instrument of public purpose, and effort to bring to light the hidden facts, to set them into relation with each other, and make a picture of reality on which men can act....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us