StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Criminal damage to property: Maurice - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The general rule is criminal law is that “every person is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty by the persecution, beyond reasonable duets.” Even though they may have different criminal liabilities, but still all four brothers will be guilty for joint enterprise according to their menu rea…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.1% of users find it useful
Criminal damage to property: Maurice
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Criminal damage to property: Maurice"

Download file to see previous pages

Under the Criminal Law Act 1977 section 1, the definition of conspiracy is the moment that two people agree to commit the crime. Their actus Reus here will be that they voluntary and consciously agreed to commit the offence. The menus era will be the intension as which requires proof of menus rea of a part of those charged crimes. However, the general rule is criminal law is that “every person is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty by the persecution, beyond reasonable duets.” Even though they may have different criminal liabilities, but still all four brothers will be guilty for joint enterprise according to their menu rea.

This was held in “Steward v. Schlfiold” Maurice and Graham will be charged for aiding – in which the secondary party is aiding another in the commission of an offence. According to “Garret v. Arthur Churchill (Glass) Ltd [1969}, aiding is only possible to conduct taking place before or at the time of commission of the principle offence. R v. Bland [1988] states that, an aider, however, needs to provide some active or at least passive assistance to the principal offender. Thus still, Maurice and Graham can not be charged for murder because they did not have the intension to kill.

Also they were not aware of the fact that the drug used will kill the victim. So for them two there was lack menus rea to murder. Also did not foresaw the death or even conspire for it. So far, they will be guilty for aiding the drug administration.. another in the commission of an offence. According to "Garret v. Arthur Churchill (Glass) Ltd [1969}, aiding is only possible to conduct taking place before or at the time of commission of the principle offence. R v. Bland [1988] states that, an aider, however, needs to provide some active or at least passive assistance to the principal offender.

Thus still, Maurice and Graham can not be charged for murder because they did not have the intension to kill. Also they were not aware of the fact that the drug used will kill the victim. So for them two there was lack menus rea to murder. Also did not foresaw the death or even conspire for it. So far, they will be guilty for aiding the drug administration.Albert , even though not present at the time of crime, will still be charged for counseling the murder of Uncle Rodney. Albert knew the intension of Carl and the dangerous drug he was using and its effects.

But, however, did nothing to prevent its effects, Albert gave silent encouragement to Carl. Generally counseling is to be limited to such conduct which takes place before the commission of the principal offence so therefore, usually some distance from the vicinity. The conduct that impinges upon the mind of the principal offender is required. Yet there's no requirement that the secondary party's conduct help's bring about the principal offence, witness R v. Calhaem [1985]. Though, Albert did not take part in the offence and was not present at the time of the crime, but his withdrawal is not affective due to the reason that his withdrawal was not communicated ( before or at the time of the crime).

On the other hand Maurice will be guilty for criminal damage to the

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Criminal damage to property: Maurice Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1514860-criminal-damage-to-property-maurice
(Criminal Damage to Property: Maurice Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1514860-criminal-damage-to-property-maurice.
“Criminal Damage to Property: Maurice Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1514860-criminal-damage-to-property-maurice.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Criminal damage to property: Maurice

What Constitutes Tort Law

Legal damage to the plaintiff; that is, some of his legal rights are violated, for instance refusing him to vote without justified reasons.... It states that when a person occupying a piece of land uses something on it, which can lead to damage to its escape and keeps it permanently on land, will be responsible for any damage that may arise as a result of the escape.... Whether there is a possibility that she could sue under this rule or not 2- What type of damage is recoverable under this rule?...
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Criminal Liability for Rape, Murder and Grievous Bodily Harm

Taking the offence of criminal damage as contained in section 1(1) of the criminal damage Act 1971), the actus reus entails the damage or destruction of another person's property5.... Thus, the mens rea in this case does not require exceeding an intention to commit criminal damage.... For an illustration, in the case of aggravated criminal damage contrary to section 1(2) of the criminal damage Act 1971, this offence is committed if a defendant damages or destroys a property while all along intending to endanger life6....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Major Criminal Law Issues

In a criminal damage for instance, the actus reus will be that another person's property has been destroyed and or damaged.... 5]It must be established that the victim suffered grievous bodily harm or in a criminal damage, that the property was destroyed or damaged.... The imposition of liability on a defendant charged for the commission of a criminal offence is generally based on the fact that at the time of committing the guilty act, the defendant possessed a guilty state of mind....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

The Case of Revision R v G and Another

The House of Lords held that since the boys did not maliciously and deliberately set out to cause damage to the property, neither did they foresee the risk of the damages that could occur through the spread of the fire, they could not be deemed to be guilty of arson.... The case of Caldwell qualified Section 1 of the criminal damage Act of 1971, by holding that a person may be deemed to have acted recklessly in two instances when he gives no thought to the risks attached to his act....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

A-Level Law in Action

In the paper “A-Level Law in Action” the author analyses the elements of murder: Actus Rea (guilty act) and Mens rea (guilty mind).... Mens rea varies from recklessness to intention.... Direct intent connotes a situation, wherein the accused's motive was to ensure some outcome.... hellip; The author explains that indirect or oblique intent arises when the accused can foresee the outcome, as being highly probable, and the accused does not desire that outcome....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

ODE Solver and Optimization

To find the size and location of the damper devices, a representative damping formulation is used where the members of the buildings are assumed to reduce exponentially according to a formulation of algorithm based model behavior of the strain property of hardened materials.... The tremors and external forces that makes buildings shake and collapse due to natural forces like earthquakes, have in the recent past resulted in increased loss of human life....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Mens Rea in Criminal Law

In course of development of criminal law two main tests have been introduced; subjective and objective tests.... From the onset, it is imperative to acknowledge that mens rea is the is the guilty mind aspect of the accused person and it must be proved together with Actus reus which is the physical element of the crime....
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Building and Maintaining Resilience and Security in Small or Rural Airports

hellip; The security lighting of these facilities is a cheap and effective deterrent measure over intrusions and criminal activities.... "Building and Maintaining Resilience and Security in Small or Rural Airports" paper examines risks facing small airports, their resilience, security as well as disaster recovery systems in place with regards to modern threats....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us