StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Kant and Mill Ideologies - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93% of users find it useful
Kant and Mill Ideologies
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Kant and Mill Ideologies"

Kant and Mill Ideologies According to John Stuart Mill, the fundamental principle of morality refers to the principle of utility, or Greatest Happiness Principle, which asserts that individuals tend to act in a manner that is most likely to derive maximum pleasure, satisfaction, and happiness to a wide range of people (LaFave 1). Indeed, Mill claims that people should value the principle of utility as a tool that derives secondary moral principles, which promote general happiness (Lee 1). The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure. As such, we can judge people’s actions based on the secondary principles, which promote general happiness. On the other hand, Immanuel Kant defines the fundamental principle of morality as the Categorical Imperative which basis moral requirements on a standard of rationality (Johnson 1). He refers to the fundamental principle of morality as the law of an autonomous will where moral reasons are supreme to any other reason (Johnson 1). Ideally, one formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative encourages individuals to act on a motivational thought that one can consistently urge the society to adopt as a universal law as it will derive equal worth and equal respect. Notably, the Mill and Kant's fundamental principle of morality differ. Indeed, Mill abhors the utilitarian, which defines general happiness as a secondary moral principle that refers to happiness as intended pleasure and absence of pain, while Kant defines moral requirements and moral worthiness as acts of good will. According to Mill, we can tell the difference between higher pleasures and lower pleasures by analyzing the involvement of distinctively human faculties in dealing with any pleasure. He claims that we can ascertain the difference where a pressure is higher than another pleasure if and only if most people who have experienced both pleasures have always preferred the first to the second regardless of their respective quantities (Booher 1). For example, a person undergoing high pleasures of learning new things has a distinct experience in in his brain compared to a person undergoing low pleasures of eating and drinking. Indeed, Will objects to the idea that pleasure is the only good, it is the highest good, and it is universal (Booher 1). He claims that there are things that people consider and that there are differences in quantity and qualities of pleasure where certain pleasures are more desirable and valuable than others in relation to moral deliberations (Booher 1). Notably, Mill’s objection to the argument against utilitarianism should reckon the distinct value that pleasures attract with higher pleasures having more value than lower pleasures. It should also distinguish between the quantity and quality of pleasure as well as favor some activities as being better than others are. More so, his argument should address the problems that relate to differentiating quantities and qualities of pleasure. Ideally, Mill's account of higher pleasures answers the objection by demonstrating that certain pleasures are better and valuable than others (Booher 1). It also negates the idea that pleasure is highest natural good and confirms that higher pleasure is the basic principle of ethics, and the foundation of morality. According to Mill, human beings are different from non-human animals in a morally interesting way. Ideally, Mil noted that animals are irrational and are not self-aware or did not have cognitive capabilities as human beings. As such, he established that human beings are different from animals because human beings can experience mental pleasures and interestingly prefer mental pleasure to body pleasures (“John Start Mill” 1). He supports this by asserting that individuals who enjoy all pleasures qualify as the only judges who equally crave for mental pleasures. Indeed, it is factual that all animals tend to resent or retaliate, any damage destined for us or to those with whom we sympathize (Mill 1). In fact, every animal and human beings seeks to defend themselves by attacking those who hurt us or are planning to hurt us or our close associates. One of the fundamental differences between humans and non-human animals is the difference in the ability to sympathize with others. Ideally, animals can only sympathize with their young ones or with superior animals that assist them in a given way (Mill 1). However, human beings have the capacity to sympathize with all human beings and all sensible beings. This amounts to a moral difference, which derives moral significance in that it limits the moral actions of non-human animals. As such, non-human animals do not enjoy the Greatest Happiness Principle to the fullest. On the other hand, human beings have no limits to their moral actions and can thus enjoy the Greatest Happiness Principle to the maximum. According to Kant the morally important difference between human beings and non-human animals is the fact that only humans have the capacity to resist desires and choose a course of action, assess and judge the moral principles that govern our beliefs and actions as well as regulating those beliefs and actions (Korsgaard 11-12). He further notes that the morally important difference resides in the fact that unlike the non-human animals, humans’ conduct is subject to moral guidance and moral evaluation since animals have no capacity to regulate their conduct in relation to an assessment of their principles (Korsgaard 11-12). However, he asserts that humans only have a duty to the moral status of the non-humans but not an obligation (Korsgaard 11-12). As we can see, Kant's view of the moral difference between human beings and animals is different from Mill's view. Indeed, Kant asserts that non-humans do not have the capacity to resist desires and choose a course of action a point that Mill seems to negate by claiming that animals can actually decide to sympathize with other animals. Indeed, Kant asserts that animals have no capacity to regulate their conduct but Mill suggests otherwise. More so, while Kant claims that humans only have a duty regarding the moral status of non-humans, Mill derives an obligation to all human beings and all sensible beings including noble animals. Works Cited Booher, Troy. J.S. Mill's Test for Higher Pleasure. Web. 4 October 2013. < http://www.historyofethics.org/122007/122007Booher.shtml> Mill, John Stuart. On the Connection between Justice and Utility. Web. 4 October 2013. < http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mill-john-stuart/1863/utility/ch05.htm> “John Stuart Mill.” Mill, Kant, Plato, and Aristotle. Web. 4 October 2013. < http://home.southernct.edu/~gillilandr1/phil200/Mill&Kant.htm> LaFave, Sandra. Utilitarianism. Web. 4 October 2013. < http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/util.htm> Lee, Eugene. An Introduction to Utilitarianism. Web. 4 October 2013. < http://www.victorianweb.org/philosophy/utilitarianism.html> Johnson, Robert. Kant's Moral Philosophy. 2008. Web. 4 October 2013. < http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/> Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Kant and Mill Ideologies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1487191-kant-and-mill-ideologie
(Kant and Mill Ideologies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1487191-kant-and-mill-ideologie.
“Kant and Mill Ideologies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1487191-kant-and-mill-ideologie.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Kant and Mill Ideologies

Stanley Cavell: Cities of Words

Name 9 April 2011 Comparison of kant and Rawls On the basis of Stanley Cavells' Cities of Words Moral perfectionism and theory is a matter of understanding and perspective from one man to another in today's day and age.... Two renowned philosophers, world over, that have made immense contribution to this field of moral perfectionism are John Rawls and Immanuel kant.... Rawls' beliefs lay within grasping hold of political thought and philosophy, in terms of understanding liberty, justice, freedom and equality in the presence of the eyes of law, whereas the beliefs of kant were on the basis of more pragmatic and rational issues that a person deals with in his everyday life....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Defining Reason and Morality in Kant

The idea of respect is one that is then further defined with the concept of morality, value and what the end result will be if these ideologies are withheld in any given situation.... From several perspectives, the ideologies of Kant are able to show logical solutions to given circumstances and environmental needs.... When a manager or leader is able to use reason and actions based on humanitarian ideologies then it helps to offer better advancement within the company....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Bubble Tea in Singapore

Hence, we define consumer behavior as: The analysis of personalities and groups and the ideologies they employ to choose, secure, employ, and throw away goods, services,... Bubble Tea in Singapore Name Instructor Task Date Introduction Bubble tea is the term given for pearl milk tea (PMT) and additional comparable beverages that began in teashops in the 1980s in Taiwan....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

Kants Enlightenment Philosophy

This era is referred to as the enlightenment era since it was the period in which traditional ethics were being replaced by individualism and reason This paper will focus on the enlightenment philosophy of Emanuel kant and how it has been applied in various works.... Name Instructor Course Date kant's Enlightenment Philosophy Abstract Philosophers have over the years put forward different theories and concepts on ethics, morals, decision making, and life in general....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Way Our Lives Should Be Governed: Sandel and Nagel

Sandel's ideas, however, seems to be more influenced by the basic ideas of kant and mill and he largely distinguishes between the two to provide an explanation of the self and the society.... Sandel's ideas on self and society reflect the basic philosophical ideologies of liberalism and how one should be self-governed.... Thus self-perception according to kant is based on the presentation of the actuality....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Modern Ideas of Conservatism

The author of the "Modern Ideas of Conservatism" paper describes what it is that conservatism (a political and social philosophy) is trying to conserve.... The author also describes and analyzes the relationship between welfare and individual rights in Political Liberalism.... hellip; According to Kukathas (2003), political liberalism is a modification to John Rawls's theory of justice....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Comparing and Contrasting the USA and the USSR

This coursework "Comparing and Contrasting the USA and the USSR" focuses on the USSR and the USA that functioned for more than half a century as the world's superpowers.... Their differences and similarities would change the way in which nations operated.... nbsp;… The constant competition between the two superpowers helped to generate the discovery of different technologies that improved life for the world's citizens....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Are We Living in a Unipolar World

The two major antagonists had different ideologies which were communism and capitalism.... Each of the powers wanted their ideologies to dominate the world.... The power system could not be controlled because every state wanted its ideologies presented....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us