StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Construct Development and Scale Creation - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The researcher of the following paper casts light upon the emotional intelligence and can be traced back on the research of Thorndike (1920) who presupposed that intelligence includes the emotional and social component (qt. in Mandell & Pherwarni, 2003).  …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.1% of users find it useful
Construct Development and Scale Creation
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Construct Development and Scale Creation"

I. Construct Development and Scale Creation  A. Origin and Definition – Emotional intelligence can be traced back on the research of Thorndike (1920) who presupposed that intelligence includes the emotional and social component (qtd. in Mandell & Pherwarni, 2003). In 1967, researchers like Guilford and H. Eysenck (1995) reported that indeed intelligence transcends beyond the traditional cognitive IQ and includes one hundred and two different types of intelligence (qtd. in Lyusin, 2006). This was later supported by Howard Gardner when he articulated his theory of multiple intelligences categorizing it as intra personal and interpersonal intelligences within within the framework of multiple intelligences (Gardner, 1993). His concept on intrapersonal intelligence or the capacity and competence to understand one’s self and apply it effectively in its relationship to others and in life in general as articulated in his concept on interpersonal intelligence served as the basic building block upon which future theorists will build their research on (Carmeli & Josman, 2006). Emotional intellience came as a formal construct with Peter Salovey and John Mayer who formally developed the term “emotional intelligence”. In its first version of their study, EI was defined as the “the ability to monitor one’s own and other’s feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them, and to use this information to guide one’s thinking and action” (Salovey and Mayer, 1990 qtd. In Lyusin, 2006: 55). Later, the definition was expanded into the ability to perceive accurately, appraise, and express emotion; the ability to access and/or generate feelings when they facilitate thought; the ability to understand emotion and emotional knowledge; the ability to regulate emotions to promote emotional and intellectual growth” (Mishra and Mohapatra, 2010:54). B. Items used to sample the domain For simplicity and universality to sample the domain, we will use Gardner’s five domains of EQ (1993) which are; 1. Knowing your emotions. 2. Managing your own emotions. 3. Motivating yourself. 4. Recognising and understanding other people's emotions. 5. Managing relationships, ie., managing the emotions of others. C. Method of scaling for the domain Instrument In scaling or providing the choice of response for the questionnaire of the items of the instrument, we will used the Likert type scales by providing a 1 to 5 options which refer to the options of strongly agree, agree, neither agree or disagree, disagree and strongly disagree. This will provide sufficient variance or variability of the reply among respondents. We will also use a self-report questionnaire. Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire 1. I do not react when verbally assaulted □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 2. I know when I feel down □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 3. I know when I am angry □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 4. I often worry □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 5. When people offends me, I always remember □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 6. Some people just irritate me □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 7. I get anxious when I face difficulty □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 8. There are times that I do not feel confident about myself □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 9. The future is scary □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 10. When other people expresses their emotions such as happiness and grief, I am fine with the idea □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 11. I feel pity when I see others get hurt □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 12. There are times that I wish I can change the world □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 13. When I feel love towards another, I am capable of doing it so. □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 14. I am comfortable when people says “I love you” to me. □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree 15. When I feel it, I have no problem saying “I love you” to the people I love. □ Strongly Agree □ Agree □ Neither Agree or Disagree □ Disagree □ Strongly Disagree II. Analysis and justification The five domains of Gardner (1993) was used because this was to able to capture the essence of Emotional Intelligence which is to recognize one’s emotions and others, able to manage it and direct to influence the emotions of others. In addition, it is also universally accepted as a valid domain in determining emotional intelligence. We used the Likert’s one to five scale options which refer to strongly agree, agree, neither agree or disagree, disagree and strongly disagree to offer variable and variance of the response. The questions that were formulated should adequately answer and cover the construct. With regard to sampling population, we will use Rummel’s (1970) suggestion of 1:4 item to response ratio which will make the sampling size to 60 (items in questionnaire x 4). Ideally, the sampling population should have homogeneity in terms of certain characteristic such as profession for the study to capture the emotional intelligence of a certain group in a particular context. The samples should represent a certain population which the research intends to study or make inference about. As an example, for the study to determine the emotional intelligence of student’s or employees in a particular school or employees of a particular corporation, the population of that group should be represented in the sample of the study. Method used for item selection Ideally, the construct which we intend to measure should first be defined as what was done in the first section of this paper. Then develop items of instrument that can best encapsulate the idea of the construct. In our case, we will use the five dimensions of theoretical universe of emotional intelligence that was created by Gardner (1993) for simplicity and universality. The questionnaires that will be developed should be able to represent all the 5 dimensions of emotional intelligence as created by Gardner (1993). Determining the construct validity To determine if the questions developed best represents the five dimensions of emotional intelligence, we have to administer validity and reliability test. This will detect the existence or non-existence of the criteria that can “represent the traits or construct of interest” (Young, 1996). It will determine through a criterion-related validity how the extent of the scores can be related to a criterion. The criterion can be a certain behavior or aptitude of interest that we would like to determine using the test scores of our instrument (Key, 2002). One of the easiest methods to test the related validity of the criteria is to administer the instrument to a population that is already known to have or exhibit the characteristic or trait that will be measured. This population who has that trait to be tested can be determined by a panel of experts. A wide range of items can then used for the test with invalid questions taken after the group has taken the test. Items that are considered irrelevant in determining the construct can then be removed (Key, 2002). To illustrate, let us assume that we already have a population who has already been identified by experts to have a high emotional intelligence and let them take our test along those who are known to have poor emotional aptitude. We are going to develop a list of criteria that can determine our construct which is emotional intelligence. To determine the validity the criteria of our construct, we are going let them take the test along with the others and then analyze their responses of the test. Since we already know who in our group has already a high emotional intelligence, their response should be consistent with the desired result of the test and those who are known to have poor emotional intelligence should score differently. Determining the Reliability of the Instrument: Retest Method The simplest way to test the reliability of our instrument is to do a retest. Simply put, we will administer the same test to the same group of people after a defined period of time. The reliability of our instrument can be assessed by comparing the consistency of the result of the two tests (Young, 1996). To whom would the instrument be generalized?  The instrument can be generalized when random sampling is made in determining the representatives of a population. Random sampling would allow the result of the study to be generalized to a bigger group or population. This is possible especially if the sampling is done through simple random sampling. That is, the sample selected by one individual by chance will also be likely picked by another with similar likelihood. References: Carmeli, Abraham and Josman, Zvi, E. (2006). The Relationship Among Emotional Intelligence, Task Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Human Performance. (19)4: 403-419 Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books. Key, James (2002). Research Design in Occupational Education. Available at Accessedon September 13, 2011 LYUSIN, D. B. (2006). Emotional Intelligence as a Mixed Construct: Its Relation to Personality and Gender. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology. (44)6: 54-68 Mandell, Barbara, Pherwani (2003). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE: A GENDER COMPARISON. Journal of Business and Psychology. 17(3): 387-404 Mishra, Priti Suman; Mohapatra, A. K. Das. Vikalpa Relevance of Emotional Intelligence for Effective Job Performance:. An Empirical Study. The Journal for Decision Makers. (35)1: pp 53-61 Young, Cheri (1996). Validity Issues in Measuring Psychological Constructs: The Case of Emotional Intelligence. www.socialresearchmethods.net. Available at Retrieved September 12, 2011 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Emotional Intelligence Psychology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/psychology/1431599-emotional-intelligence
(Emotional Intelligence Psychology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/psychology/1431599-emotional-intelligence.
“Emotional Intelligence Psychology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/psychology/1431599-emotional-intelligence.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Construct Development and Scale Creation

Development of Personality Tests

The paper "development of Personality Tests"  focuses on discussing the process of developing a personality test using workshop empirical data.... When designing this test, I had a clear indication, of the target group, to ensure that the test precise is included in the questionnaires to be predetermined so that the later development stages of the test can be based upon its effectiveness.... After all these considerations were accounted for, the actual test construction then commenced, and I followed the appropriate stages in test development because a discrepancy in one developmental stage can mean or contribute to the failure of a personality test....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Identification Types of the Components of a Cluster

The paper "The Identification Types of the Components of a Cluster" concerns the application of aggregation functions such as summarization and average to derived values is based on conversions to absolute or ratio values.... Labels can be omitted if the types can be distinguished.... hellip; The disjointness for clusters can be weakened for relationship types....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Sense of Humor and Humor Styles

The Sense of Humor Questionnaire (SHQ-6), (Svebak, 1996) evaluates different components of the humor process and the Multidimensional Sense of Humor Scale (MSHS), (Thorson & Powell, 1993) investigates different humor behaviors such as humor creation and humor appreciation.... The Coping Humor scale (CHS), (Martin & Lefcourt, 1983), participants evaluate how they use humor as a coping strategy.... In 1999, Martin and associates (Phulik-Doris and Martin, 1999) developed a humor scale measuring four humor styles: Social humor (tendency to share humor with others to put them at ease and enhance relationships); self-enhancing humor (tendency to maintain a humorous outlook on life even when not with others, to cope with stress or to cheer oneself up); Self-defeating humor (tendency to amuse others by self-disparagement to hide one's true feelings from self and others); and Hostile humor (tendency to use offensive humor to put down or manipulate others)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Proposal

Analysis of Concepts of European Identity

These assumptions are the creation of political-territorial growth over the past centuries that have cast the state in the role of architect and symbol of international society (Murphy, 1996; Taylor, 1994).... This paper discusses the complex difficulties involved in methodically studying identity concepts in comparative politics....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

The Question of Proficiency

To assess proficiency, tests have been designed that have descriptors for various levels of achievement and is usually expressed as a number on a scale.... A five point scale such as the International Second Language Proficiency Rating (ISLPR) formerly called Australian Second Language Proficiency Rating (ASLPR) used the + symbol to make distinctions between the fine points on the scale.... ‘Proficiency is a definite, if intuitively held, concept and not just a formal construct....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Construct Development, Scale Creation and Process Analysis

"Construct Development, scale creation and Process Analysis" paper describes the conceptual development and validation of a scale to measure the multicultural environment of the workplace while observing certain positive and negative employee behaviors such as multipotentiality among the employees....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Validity and Reliability of the Myers Briggs Test

nbsp; It then started the long journey of Briggs and Myers that concluded with the creation of the MBTI.... The first section gives the overview of the history and development of the MBTI, as presented in the succeeding paragraphs.... Briggs and her daughter, Isabel Briggs Myers in the development of the MBTI, a project that lasted for two decades and a half (Bayne, 1997; Morgan & Morgan, 2007; Quenk, 2009)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Brian Davis the Reality of God and the Problem of Evil

Under religion, a God is considered as having ultimate power towards the development of the research, and evaluation of morality.... The argument that is made in the review is that evil is a development from free choice.... The second chapter where Davies uses the construct of Aquinas indicates that there is a provision for a perfectly good God, which pre-empts the evil forms....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us