StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Aquinas Fourth Way the Argument from Gradations - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of "Aquinas Fourth Way the Argument from Gradations" paper focuses on the understanding of Aquinas’s arguments for the existence of god and therefore begins with the analysis of his graduation criteria. He talks about good, better, and best…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
Aquinas Fourth Way the Argument from Gradations
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Aquinas Fourth Way the Argument from Gradations"

Aquinas Fourth Way the Argument from Gradations The Aquinas’s arguments about God are one of the interesting arguments as these arguments illustrate five ways arguments with regard to the existence of the almighty God. The fourth way of Aquinas’s reasoning may be summarized as “if things are more or less good, something must be best and this something is God” (Elders, 111). Generally, the interpretation of this argument is that since in nature there exist good things and better things, then there must exist best thing and this best thing must be God. However, throughout Aquinas’s arguments, there is belief that the argument for the existence of God is only possible if we could think of the works or the effects of God. For this argument to proceed Aquinas’s idea is that human beings have to think of something as an effects of God and in the fourth way of argument, this thing is the best effect of God The understanding of the Aquinas’s arguments for the existence of god therefore begins with the analysis of his gradation criteria. He talks about good, better, and best. He finds some things to be “better”, true, and noble while others are less good, true or noble respectively (Elders, 114). In this way of argument, it is difficult to integrate his arguments especially when it comes to this kind of comparison. Many philosophers and researchers have questioned his arguments asking questions. For example if comparing two or more things, then you say that A is better than B, is Aquinas trying to assert that there is something better compared to the two and many others whose perfection cannot be challenged? This forms the basis for criticisms of the Aquinas fourth argument. The challenge here is to prove that there is actually something that is perfect beyond improvement. However as observed by Soccio (228), it would be misleading to argue that given a number of things with different degrees of goodness, there is one among those things that would not be possible to make any changes with regard to improving it. In other words, he asserts that there is no point believing Aquinas’s idea that there is something perfect beyond improvement. It therefore forms the weaker point of the Aquinas arguments since he believes that if we have to group different things together, yes we will have some of the best things, however, it would still be possible to improve that thing with regard to the degree of goodness. It is also possible to improve better to become better than the best. Another critic of Aquinas’s fourth way of argument is that he describes God in a sequence of being best among a group but denies later in the proceeding metaphors that he cannot group him in a group of the same kinds. In the next lines, he states that he does not think of God as the best or a group of things that can be graded together with respect to intelligent (Soccio, 230). The question therefore is; how can you compare things as good, better and best or truer, nobler, etc if in the first place you can’t group them together or they are not similar? In this way, it does not explain or describe the truth about the existence of God in this fourth way of argument because it is not clear. While Aquinas describes the effects, it is also important to note that we can only compare things with similar characteristics but God has no characteristics similar to any as he explains. However other philosophers have argued that this use of parallel texts is not misleading but it is misinterpreted by the individual’s readers of the Aquinas texts. According to Wippel (469), the perfections mentioned by the Aquinas are the transcendental perfections. In this context the interpretation of things like the “more” or less do not necessarily mean that the arguments are based on the things that are perceived by the senses and known by the intellect. In this point of view, the true of the text does not refer to the logical truth of intellect but to the ontological truth of things. With this regard, it is important to realize that it is difficult to interpret the texts and the meanings would come out depending on your interpretation. The idea that effects are like their causes as described by Aquinas thinking is also misleading to some extent. It is not true to argue that the effects of any particular are similar to the causes. Naturally, there are different effects of nature that are not similar to their causes. As observed by Velde (209), something that gives others perfection has this perfection to the highest degree is misleading. However the way of thinking of Aquinas that the maximum being gives the maxim to the other. This way of thinking is acceptable to some extent. As outlined by Wippel (472), the idea that when an individual things needs restoration, it can only be restored to its normal being or functioning using the perfect or the maximum thing. In this respect, the maximum thing resembles the perfect nature of God. In this way of argument, something that is closer to the most perfect resembles high degree of perfection compared to those that are far from the perfect thing. As a result, we see a different thing with different perfection in nature. This explains the differences that we can see and God represent the perfect being that influences the nature of these other beings. It is also observable that this way of argument illustrates some of the most important differences between God and the natural things available on earth. In elaboration of this way of Aquinas arguments, it is important to realize if God is perfect, then it influences the level of perfection in other beings and hence it explains why other beings and materials may experience difficulties or deficiencies in one way or another. In this respect, the perfect being who is God has taken away some of the perfections and hence we should go back to him to seek for the perfections. The above arguments have however been very controversial to the understanding of what was meant by Aquinas in his argument. It is difficult for the reader to correlate both the deontological point of view and the transcendental point of view. For example, in the beginning of his texts he states things like more or less truth or more or less perfect which are very difficult to correlate with the actual experiences by the individuals. However as observed by Velde (212), his intention was to shrike thought among the individual people and not to incorporate literal meanings. He also observes that the intention of Aquinas is more relevant to the effects of the so described as the perfect being and not on the individuals. However lack of grouping makes it difficult to compare things in a sequence as good better best. The question that is not answered in the Aquinas way of thinking is that do we have other things that are similar to God? Of course we don’t have but the problem that still remains is how we can go ahead and says that God exists and is the perfect being or the maximum. The strongest point of the Aquinas’s argument and the way of thinking is in the last statements when he argues that “there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God” (Wippel, 471). This tends to give more light on the differences that exist within the nature. It is actually true and can be seen that there are different causes of goodness, from animals to plants. There must be something therefore that is in existence and hence result into these effects. This may explain the differences in beings as they are affected by the most perfect being. Other perfections are also caused by this being. According to Velde (213), this explains the differences in perfection and why it is important to seek for the perfection from the most perfect so as to become perfect as well. In conclusions, the fourth way of argument presents some of the best explanations and assists in the understanding of Gods existence. However, it is not very clear due to the parallel texts that are stated by Aquinas. In this perspective the first issue that most people cannot agree with is the idea that there is a perfect thing that cannot exhibit the possibility of making any further changes to it. The idea of having good, better and best does not explain the existence of God. This is because Aquinas also states in the next statements that this perfect thing is not comparable to any being and hence it is God. In this point of view, it is difficult to compare the incomparable as good better and best. Another observation is that the idea that the maximum in any genus is the cause of all that is in that genus is contradicted. However, the point of argument that there must be something that is perfect to all beings seem relevant as explained by Aquinas that this is the cause of the goodness in this beings. This is evident in all the activities and things happening in nature and hence we can believe that there is something that is the cause of this variability and hence that something is God. The explanation of Aquinas is therefore relevant to some extent but does not give clear account of the perfect being. The fourth way explains clearly the impacts and how the perfect being is exhibited but does not come clear on the issues of perfection. References Elders, Leo. “The philosophical theology of st. Thomas Aquinas.” Geneva: Laiden Publishers, 1990. Soccio, Doughlas J. “Archetypes of wisdom: An introduction to Philosophy.” Belmont: Wadsworth, 2007. Velde, Rudi A. “Participation and substantiality in Thomas Aquinas, volume 46.” Geneva: E. J. Brill, 1995. Wippel, John F. “the metaphysical thought of Thomas Aquinas: from finite being to uncreated being.” New York: Catholic University of America, 2000. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 4”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1418812-philosophy
(Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1418812-philosophy.
“Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 4”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1418812-philosophy.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Aquinas Fourth Way the Argument from Gradations

How do the arguments that motivate the Five Ways also help us to understand the nature of mind

The first three of his cosmological arguments emanated from the idea that things that changed required a virtually unchangeable source.... The fourth confirmation of the existence of God dealt with the moral arguments while the fifth and final ideology came from teleological arguments.... Motion is perceived as the alteration of something from potentiality to its reality.... However, not a single thing can move from a state of potentiality to actuality unless it is excited to behave in that way by something else that is in its actuality....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Cosmological Argument. The forms of cosmological arguments

The first way was the argument from motion, the second one was causation of existence, the third one was the argument of contingence, the fourth one was the argument from degrees and perfection, and the fifth one was the argument from intelligent design.... the argument from Motion Using the works of Aristotle, Aquinas through observation, concluded that any moving object is able to move because another supreme object or supreme force makes it move....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Saint Thomas Aquinas and his influence on Western thought

While in this university, Aquinas chose to pursue the Dominican Order, despite the fact that he faced much opposition from his family.... After his graduation from the university in 1248 with a degree in theology, he got back to Cologne and started his literary works.... from there henceforth Aquino wrote no more.... Name Instructor Course Date Saint Thomas aquinas and his influence on Western thought St.... Thomas aquinas is also referred to as Aquino, lived between 1225- 1274....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Objections to and Arguments for the Existence of God

The fourth argues that everything has a position on a scale from worst to best, slowest to fastest and other such extremes.... The paper will critically analyze this argument by addressing Aquinas' reasons for God's existence and objections to God's existence as provided in his text, Summa Theologie.... The paper will critically analyze this argument by addressing Aquinas' reasons for God's existence and objections to God's existence as provided in his text, Summa Theologie....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Platos philosophical approach

Finally, I have learned from my philosophy subject that philosophy is a system of values of a community where persons live.... Finally, my first introduction to philosophy was that I was taught that the meaning of philosophy is LOVE OF WISDOM or philosophia) at least two quotations from your readings that were most important to you.... READINGS INCLUDE: In the Apology retrieved from http://classics.... I had often thought that philosophy was the study of the different techniques to win a debate or an argument....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Christians in the Conduct of Modern War

The author of the paper "Christians in the Conduct of Modern War" will begin with the statement that when War is viewed from a Christian's perspective there are many theorizations that come into play in order to try and find the justification for its usage.... This compiled research will examine this theory and other moral principles from a Christian outlook concerning modern War.... hen War is viewed from a Christian's perspective there are many theorizations that come into play in order to try and find the justification for its usage....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Issues on the Existence of God

Dawkins explains an argument from his book, that is, faith is blind whereas science is evidence-based (92) in which he argues that faith is by no reasons strengthening its grounds in the 21st century when it has nothing to do with evidence.... Another argument that Dawkins explains from his book is the Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit, that is, the designer is dead; otherwise, one must explain who designed the designer (113).... Hence, ontological arguments reveal the fact that we can know about the existence of God from the very definition of God....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Philosophy of religion exam review questions answers

His second name was Bibleland, a city of three religions (Islam, Christianity and Judaism) connected by the belief in one God.... Speaking about the religious of ancient Athens, believing in different gods was very.... ... ... Now religion does not play a very important role and less than 50% of people in St Louis are religious. ...
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us