StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes's Views on Self, Death, and Evil - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes's Views on Self, Death, and Evil" presents the thinkers' ideas on God as the source of our evils, the soul as more than speech, mannerisms and memory, and death that "does not exist as long as people are alive when death occurs people no longer exist"…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.3% of users find it useful
Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartess Views on Self, Death, and Evil
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes's Views on Self, Death, and Evil"

Philosophy Hume and Self David Hume was doubtful about the presence of the self. Nonetheless, he doesnt plainly, what makes up a person. Hume believes that everything that can be known can be known through an impression. For example, I know that there is a chair here because I have an impression of the chair. Since there is no such thing as an impression of the self, self therefore doesn’t exist. All there is, then, is a series of bundles of impressions or perceptions. As indicated by David, our insight into all things on the planet originates from impressions and recognitions. Subsequently, it isnt right to infer that our insight into self is a special case. Since all information is transient and non-persevering, then self is not steady, not constant and not consistent. Consequently, he accepted that there is no predictable self. Dissimilar to David, Kant accepts that people contain souls. First, Kant believes that Hume is correct that there is no impression of the self. But this does not mean that the self does not exist. However, according to Kant, in order for us to make sense of experience, we need to believe in the self. For instance, if I see a chair here now and then I see it in another place, I would think that somebody has moved the chair, and that the two impressions are related. In order for me to think this, there must be something that is organizing my experiences of the chair. This something is the self. Therefore, the self has to exist, because the self is the necessary condition that makes experience possible. 2. Sartre on Existence Sartre expresses his observation that the key or core of existentialism is the idea that for human beings, being there is more important than the purpose of being there. This means existence precedes essence. According to Sartre, in a case of the paper knife, it exists to cut letters. It would not exist in the event that it didnt have a reason to it. "We wouldnt create a paper blade without comprehending what it’s for" So in the event that you utilize it to cut someone, that is bad in light of the fact that that is not its motivation which only humans can possess. Thus, for this situation, embodiment goes before the presence. In the event that individuals occurred in the same route as paper blades, then God was deduction something: I need something that does x (303). Generally as there are things that you ought to and ought to do with paper blades, there are things that we as people ought to and ought not to do. But Sartre says that for individuals, presence goes before substance. Fundamentally, we exist first and afterward we do things that characterize ourselves and live our lives in whatever way we pick (and this decides our path, and what it intends to be an individual.) Through existing, we make our quintessence and therefore, existence precedes essence (306). For Sartre, human beings are such that their existence precedes essence. Because of this, when we are born, we do not have a fixed purpose or essence. Hence we are nothing or nothingness. But it is also because we are nothing that we are free, because we have the space to become whatever we choose to become. Therefore, for Sartre, nothingness is the condition that makes freedom possible. 3. Descartes’s Meditations From the dream argument, he observes three things. First, that he frequently has observations all that much like the ones he has, for the most part, have in sensation while he am envisioning. Secondly, that there are no distinct signs to recognize dream experience from waking background. This leads to his third observation that it is conceivable that he is imagining at this time and that the majority of his discernments are false (294). Concerning knowledge, the dream argument shows that since we cannot be sure at any given moment whether we are dreaming, we therefore cannot know whether the external world actually exists. From the Evil argument, As opposed to expecting that God is the source of our evils we will accept that there exists a shrewd evil spirit, who is fit for misleading us in the same way we gathered God to be capable. In this way, we can have the motivation to uncertainty the totality of what our minds allow us to know and additionally the scientific information that it appears we possess. Therefore, if it is possible that there is an evil demon, then even our beliefs about the basic truths of mathematics and logic are cast into doubt. If Descartes is being deceived by the evil demon, then he is being deceived. If he is being deceived, then he is thinking. If he is thinking, he has to exist: “I think, therefore I am.” This is the one thing that remains certain even if everything else is cast into doubt. 4. Clone: The Dissimilar self When someone passes on, the memory is left with the loved ones for as long as the loved ones and those who knew the person exist. This means that the physical self may be gone but immediately the person dies, their memory lives as non-visible selfs. The implication of this is that when a person ‘dies’ or is thought to have died for sometimes, then reappears, the individual is no longer the same. This is because his or her self had already started existing within the minds of the loved ones as a memory of the feelings and perceptions. This scenario has been witnessed for many years when someone thought to have died suddenly returns home. If this is taken to be true, therefore, making a clone may be a technological step but returning the same person is different. The loved ones will not be able to fully accept the clone as their dead person even with the improvement to match the person. This failure is based on two things, first, the dead person had already started living in the memory of the people. Secondly, the clone does not live in the same time and space as their loved ones, simply because the clone has to take sometimes to learn the identity of the dead. These too are the differences that the clone will have. Further, the soul is more than speech, mannerisms and memory and hence it is not replaceable. 5. The Fear of Death “Death does not exist as long as people are alive when death occurs people no longer exist. This, therefore, means that death should not concern human beings”. This statement expresses that people are wrong to fear death since they either have no control over it or that as long as they are alive, death is inexistence. However, many people are afraid of death in every situation. The fear of death can be explained from several perspectives. First, human beings are afraid of change. Death is the irreversible change that converts people from the bodily existence to a rather less known and studied the self, the non-physical existence. This fear of irreversible change makes people fear the process that bring about the change especially to the unknown. This process is death. Secondly, from the above statement, it is agreeable that if death should not concern human beings, their life on earth can be based on the accumulation of wealth with a perception that they will live forever. The implication of this is that people fear anything that will lead to loss of accumulated wealth. Death being irreversible, therefore, becomes the ultimate fear. Thirdly, the fear of loss is also a key aspect in fearing death. People fear that through death, they will lose the love they have known whether they are the ones dying of the bereaved. This perception can be used to show the gap between human desires and the nature of reality in that we want everything that matters to us in this world to last forever. However, the reality is that nothing will. It is this gap between our desires and reality that causes us to fear death, and causes the suffering that comes along with such fear. Works cited Solomon, R., M. Kathleen and M. Clancy. Introducing Philosophy: A Text With Integrated Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes's Views on Self, Death, and Evil Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words, n.d.)
Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes's Views on Self, Death, and Evil Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1874310-i-do-not-need-i-topic
(Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes'S Views on Self, Death, and Evil Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes'S Views on Self, Death, and Evil Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1874310-i-do-not-need-i-topic.
“Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes'S Views on Self, Death, and Evil Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1874310-i-do-not-need-i-topic.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Hume, Kant, Sartre, Descartes's Views on Self, Death, and Evil

Analysis of Movie The Matrix

On the other hand, just as Descartes disproved the existence of evil genius which might be capable of telling us deceptive truth about the mathematical idea (Author 68), he proves that there is God and the mere proof of it is derived from the concept of what is perfect because of his real existence.... However, since Descartes disproved the existence of evil genius who might deceive us about the exactness of the information of the physical things (Author 68), then there is therefore truth about the existence of the physical world and the dream world....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Philosophy: Skeptcism(Descartes and Hume)

wo other similarities between the two separate views of skepticism are that skepticism is something that human beings should not have.... Both philosophers held their own specific views of how they regarded skepticism, as well as the ways to overcome the doubt that they had.... After the breaking down of the first set of knowledge and doubts, the person should then find out… Descartes believed that there should be no skepticism, especially when it has to do with learning, information, and the obtaining and retaining of knowledge. hume, on the other hand, believed that skepticism was Descartes and hume According to Descartes, skepticism involves breaking down everything that has the slightest doubt, only to leave yourself with all of the things that you are most certain about....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

What Can We Know - Rene Descartes Views

Rene Descartes' views on absolute truth, there are a variety of things that we can know, many of which are learned as a person grows, many which are not learned depending on one's exposures and much more which have to be discovered.... Certainty is one of the things that men probably cling to like the certainty of life after death, so that they can find meaning in things they do, in their existence.... The paper "What Can We Know - Rene Descartes' views" discusses that as scientists and philosophers like Descartes have proven, yes there can be certain knowledge....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Meditation One and Two by Descartes

The essay discusses the concept of existence, evil and knowledge as depicted in detail in these works.... Lastly, Descartes questions his knowledge because of the fact that evil is all around us, constantly causing us a slanted view of truth.... That is why, we all need to be governed by law and not rely on our morals and free will because with the influence of evil, we can have our own versions of the good and bad and rationalize them to fit our selfish interests....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Nietzsche and Sartre are each concerned about the definition of self

Such is the basis of arguments presented by Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean- Paul Sartre on the definition of self.... This implies that mans understanding of Task: Definition of self Philosophers invoke different understanding of the vast occurrences in the environment.... Such is the basis of arguments presented by Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean- Paul Sartre on the definition of self.... These two philosophers may disagree on many fronts, but one thing is common to both; their definition of self....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Beyond Good and Evil, Aphorism

Reason is Beyond Good and evil, Aphorism Many reasons exist why Nietzsche supports his position that the project of philosophy is flawed.... The Myth of evil: Demonizing the Enemy.... Reason is reliable… Cottingham clarifies that Descartes made philosophy, including physical science a self-reliant restraint directed by reason.... Cottingham clarifies that Descartes made philosophy, including physical science a self-reliant restraint directed by reason....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

The Concept of Empiricism and Experience

Hume is inaccurate as claims of self-concept are unsupported by senses (Lawhead 63).... The experiencing self remains one of the pre-conditions in engaging such experiences (this way, Descartes was right).... kant observes that in looking at the perceptions of both Rationalists and Empiricists and their assumptions of questioning reality, in various ways, they comprise physical objects or even God's notion of information that minds work with ideas from outside....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Paradoxes of Philosophy

The paper "Paradoxes of Philosophy" sheds light on Hume and Kant's concepts on self, the dreaming argument, and the evil demon argument in Descartes Meditations, one thing that remains certain if both arguments are correct, the identity of a synthetic clone of a loved one to a real beloved person.... Hume is of the opinion that, if at all the idea of self-exists, then it should pass for a clear and intelligible concept.... To pass for that, then the mythical self should be stemming from one impression that gives rise to every real idea and the impression should manifest consistency in our lives....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us